International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kocsis, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kocsis, R. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 47, No. 2, 126-144 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X03251092

Criminal Psychological Profiling: Validities and Abilities

Richard N. Kocsis

Criminal psychological profiling has attained unprecedented recognition despite little empirical evidence to support its validity and the absence of any thorough exposition of the skills involved with the technique. This article reports on the empirically derived conclusions of studies that sought to examine the accuracy and skill of various groups performing a profiling task. The conclusions provide some support for the contention that professional profilers can produce a more accurate prediction of an unknown offender in comparison to other studied groups. The results also give an indication of the type of skills required for proficient profiling.

Key Words: empirical evidence for psychological profiling


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
B. Snook, J. Eastwood, P. Gendreau, C. Goggin, and R. M. Cullen
Taking Stock of Criminal Profiling: A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis
Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2007; 34(4): 437 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
R. N. Kocsis
Validities and Abilities in Criminal Profiling: The Dilemma for David Canter's Investigative Psychology.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, August 1, 2006; 50(4): 458 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
C. Bennell, N. J. Jones, P. J. Taylor, and B. Snook
Validities and Abilities in Criminal Profiling: A Critique of the Studies Conducted by Richard Kocsis and His Colleagues
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, June 1, 2006; 50(3): 344 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
L S Kwok
The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism
J. Med. Ethics, September 1, 2005; 31(9): 554 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]